True; The world may be destroyed by humans over their definition of God, and just who are the true believers.
A
Does this imply God would not know falible human beings would draw such contradictory and self mutilating conclusions over God?
B
Does this mean human beings draw subjective conclusions over a generic, or universal Phenomenon or Presence, meaning they are fighting over their subjective beliefs–because they do not comprehend the generic truth?
If so to either or both questions. God holds fallible beings up to its Own standard, and so is in some fundamental way absurd. Or in the second case. God may well exist, but human beings are imagining their subjective take is the only one that is true, and human beings are absurd.
Conclusion: For religions that feel they are the one true one and so all others are false, such a conclusion is patently absurd. Anyone who thinks God can be more well defined than absolute or unconditional Love, are also absurd, and worshiping false prophets, mainly their own imaginations.
Have a great day!
As always
It is entirely up to me to see what is great, or what is my other decision about it.
Recent Comments